Letters to the editor/Rosemond: July 21

Not just an issue of First Amendment I found the editorial defending parenting advice columnist John Rosemond to be tremendously disappointing. The paper's interest in defending the First Amendment is both understandable and usually admirable. However, in this instance, your defense of Rosemond's right to free speech is blindly guided by your journalistic reflex (which typically serves this editorial board well), clearly inconsistent with Kentucky law and, most critically, counter to the best interests of your readers. The simple fact that Rosemond is identified as a "psychologist" in his column conveys to the general public a specific legal and professional endorsement of his typically...